Re: subdir-objects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Roald van Loon <roaldvanloon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> from auto-registering the plugins in the RGW core. The only fix for
> this is making the RGW core aware of the subdirs/plugins, but I think
> that's nasty design. I'd like to have it in my make conf.

This patch will turn on the option (which should also fix your problem
if I understand correctly?), and should probably be committed anyway
as newer versions of autotools will complain loudly about our current
Makefile structure.

diff --git a/src/Makefile.am b/src/Makefile.am
index 93f3331..fb7c9dd 100644
--- a/src/Makefile.am
+++ b/src/Makefile.am
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = gnu
+AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = gnu subdir-objects
 SUBDIRS = ocf java
 DIST_SUBDIRS = gtest ocf libs3 java

> So, the question is; is there a reason why we don't use subdir objects?

I believe it is just historical, and unfortunately has just been
repeated over and over. Ideally I think that there should be a
restructuring to place a Makefile.am in every subdirectory. This would
address your issue and make it significantly easier to deal with
situations where we want to build a subset of Ceph, such as just FUSE
and librados, for example.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux