Re: [PATCH 6/8] mds: don't journal bare dirfrag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> don't journal bare dirfrag when starting scatter. also add debug
> code for bare dirfrag modification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  src/mds/CDir.cc   | 1 +
>  src/mds/CInode.cc | 2 ++
>  src/mds/Server.cc | 5 +++--
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/mds/CDir.cc b/src/mds/CDir.cc
> index 211cec0..8c83eba 100644
> --- a/src/mds/CDir.cc
> +++ b/src/mds/CDir.cc
> @@ -1211,6 +1211,7 @@ void CDir::finish_waiting(uint64_t mask, int result)
>  
>  fnode_t *CDir::project_fnode()
>  {
> +  assert(get_version() != 0);
>    fnode_t *p = new fnode_t;
>    *p = *get_projected_fnode();
>    projected_fnode.push_back(p);
> diff --git a/src/mds/CInode.cc b/src/mds/CInode.cc
> index 4a592bc..8936acd 100644
> --- a/src/mds/CInode.cc
> +++ b/src/mds/CInode.cc
> @@ -1625,6 +1625,8 @@ void CInode::finish_scatter_update(ScatterLock *lock, CDir *dir,
>  
>    if (dir->is_frozen()) {
>      dout(10) << "finish_scatter_update " << fg << " frozen, marking " << *lock << " stale " << *dir << dendl;
> +  } else if (dir->get_version() == 0) {
> +    dout(10) << "finish_scatter_update " << fg << " not loaded, marking " << *lock << " stale " << *dir << dendl;
>    } else {
>      if (dir_accounted_version != inode_version) {
>        dout(10) << "finish_scatter_update " << fg << " journaling accounted scatterstat update v" << inode_version << dendl;
> diff --git a/src/mds/Server.cc b/src/mds/Server.cc
> index 00bf018..1d16d04 100644
> --- a/src/mds/Server.cc
> +++ b/src/mds/Server.cc
> @@ -4010,7 +4010,8 @@ public:
>      if (newi->inode.is_dir()) { 
>        CDir *dir = newi->get_dirfrag(frag_t());
>        assert(dir);
> -      dir->mark_dirty(1, mdr->ls);
> +      dir->fnode.version--;
> +      dir->mark_dirty(dir->fnode.version + 1, mdr->ls);

BTW I notice that fnode_t's ctor doesn't initialize version or 
snap_purged_thru (although CDir's ctor does a memset).  Does that mean 
that this is rolling over from (u64)-1 to 0 here?  Would it be simpler to 
make '1' the "don't journal me" value and leave this starting at v1?

>        dir->mark_new(mdr->ls);
>      }
>  
> @@ -4169,7 +4170,7 @@ void Server::handle_client_mkdir(MDRequest *mdr)
>    // ...and that new dir is empty.
>    CDir *newdir = newi->get_or_open_dirfrag(mds->mdcache, frag_t());
>    newdir->mark_complete();
> -  newdir->pre_dirty();
> +  newdir->fnode.version = newdir->pre_dirty();
>  
>    // prepare finisher
>    mdr->ls = mdlog->get_current_segment();
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux