On 05/04/2013 08:27 PM, Noah Watkins wrote: > > On May 4, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> it would be great to get feedback before the ceph summit to address the most prominent issues. > > One thing that has been in the back of my mind is how this proposal is influenced (if at all) by a future that includes declustered per-file raid in CephFS. I realize that may be a distant future, but it seems as though there could be a lot of overlap for the (non-client driven) rebuild/recovery component of such an architecture. Hi Noah, I'm not sure what declustered per-file raid is, which means it had no influence on this proposal ;-) Would you be so kind as to educate me ? Cheers > -Noah > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good people do nothing.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
