Supposedly, on 2013-Apr-18, at 14.31 PDT(-0700), someone claiming to be Plaetinck, Dieter scribed: > On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:09:52 -0500 > Mark Nelson <mark.nelson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > @Bryan: I did come across cleversafe. all the articles around it seemed promising, > but unfortunately it seems everything related to the cleversafe open source project > somehow vanished from the internet. (e.g. http://www.cleversafe.org/) quite weird... > > @Sage: interesting. I thought it would be more relatively simple if one assumes > the restriction of immutable files. I'm not familiar with those ceph specifics you're mentioning. > When building an erasure codes-based system, maybe there's ways to reuse existing ceph > code and/or allow some integration with replication based objects, without aiming for full integration or > full support of the rados api, based on some tradeoffs. > > @Josh, that sounds like an interesting approach. Too bad that page doesn't contain any information yet :) Greetings - it does now - see what you all think… Christopher > > Dieter -- 李柯睿 Check my PGP key here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc Current vCard here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.vcf Check my calendar availability: https://tungle.me/cdl
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
