Supposedly, on 2013-Apr-18, at 14.24 PDT(-0700), someone claiming to be Noah Watkins scribed: > On Apr 18, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I talked to some folks interested in doing a more limited form of this >> yesterday. They started a blueprint [1]. One of their ideas was to have >> erasure coding done by a separate process (or thread perhaps). It would >> use erasure coding on an object and then use librados to store the >> rasure-encoded pieces in a separate pool, and finally leave a marker in >> place of the original object in the first pool. > > This sounds at a high-level similar to work out of Microsoft: I've looked at that, and it would be somewhat similar (not completely, but borrow some ideas). Christopher > > https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/atc12/atc12-final181_0.pdf > > The basic idea is to replicate first, then erasure code in the background. > > - Noah -- 李柯睿 Check my PGP key here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc Current vCard here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.vcf Check my calendar availability: https://tungle.me/cdl
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
