Re: erasure coding (sorry)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Apr 18, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I talked to some folks interested in doing a more limited form of this
> yesterday. They started a blueprint [1]. One of their ideas was to have
> erasure coding done by a separate process (or thread perhaps). It would
> use erasure coding on an object and then use librados to store the
> rasure-encoded pieces in a separate pool, and finally leave a marker in
> place of the original object in the first pool.

This sounds at a high-level similar to work out of Microsoft:

  https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/atc12/atc12-final181_0.pdf

The basic idea is to replicate first, then erasure code in the background.

- Noah
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux