On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Neil, > > On 03/06/2013 08:27 PM, Neil Levine wrote: >> I think the multi-site RGW stuff is somewhat orthogonal to OpenStack > > Even when keystone is involved ? Good question. Yehuda: how would the asynchronously replicated user metadata interact with Keystone? >> Who approves the session at ODS and when is this decision made? > > I suspect Josh knows more than I do about this. During the cinder meeting earlier today J. Griffith said that if the nova track is too busy to host the "Roadmap for Ceph integration with OpenStack" session he was in favor of having it in the cinder track. Following his advice I suggested to Thierry Carrez to open a "Cross project" track ( http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-March/006365.html ) I don't think Cinder is such a bad place for it to be as presumably the interaction to copy the block device to a secondary location would be triggered through a Cinder API call no? Neil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
