On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bo-Syung Yang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a crush map (may not be practical, but just for demo) applied
> to a two-host cluster (each host has two OSDs) to test "ceph osd crush
> reweight":
>
> # begin crush map
>
> # devices
> device 0 sdc-host0
> device 1 sdd-host0
> device 2 sdc-host1
> device 3 sdd-host1
>
> # types
> type 0 device
> type 1 pool
> type 2 root
>
> # buckets
> pool one {
> id -1
> alg straw
> hash 0 # rjenkins1
> item sdc-host0 weight 1.000
> item sdd-host0 weight 1.000
> item sdc-host1 weight 1.000
> item sdd-host1 weight 1.000
> }
>
> pool two {
> id -2
> alg straw
> hash 0 # rjenkins1
> item sdc-host0 weight 1.000
> item sdd-host0 weight 1.000
> item sdc-host1 weight 1.000
> item sdd-host1 weight 1.000
> }
>
> root root-for-one {
> id -3
> alg straw
> hash 0 # rjenkins1
> item one weight 4.000
> item two weight 4.000
> }
>
> root root-for-two {
> id -4
> alg straw
> hash 0 # rjenkins1
> item one weight 4.000
> item two weight 4.000
> }
>
> rule data {
> ruleset 0
> type replicated
> min_size 1
> max_size 4
> step take root-for-one
> step choose firstn 0 type pool
> step choose firstn 1 type device
> step emit
> }
>
> rule metadata {
> ruleset 1
> type replicated
> min_size 1
> max_size 4
> step take root-for-one
> step choose firstn 0 type pool
> step choose firstn 1 type device
> step emit
> }
>
> rule rbd {
> ruleset 2
> type replicated
> min_size 1
> max_size 4
> step take root-for-two
> step choose firstn 0 type pool
> step choose firstn 1 type device
> step emit
> }
>
>
> After crush map applied, the osd tree looks as:
>
> # id weight type name up/down reweight
> -4 8 root root-for-two
> -1 4 pool one
> 0 1 osd.0 up 1
> 1 1 osd.1 up 1
> 2 1 osd.2 up 1
> 3 1 osd.3 up 1
> -2 4 pool two
> 0 1 osd.0 up 1
> 1 1 osd.1 up 1
> 2 1 osd.2 up 1
> 3 1 osd.3 up 1
> -3 8 root root-for-one
> -1 4 pool one
> 0 1 osd.0 up 1
> 1 1 osd.1 up 1
> 2 1 osd.2 up 1
> 3 1 osd.3 up 1
> -2 4 pool two
> 0 1 osd.0 up 1
> 1 1 osd.1 up 1
> 2 1 osd.2 up 1
> 3 1 osd.3 up 1
>
>
> Then, I reweight osd.0 (device sdc-host0) in crush map to 5 through:
>
> ceph osd crush reweight sdc-host0 5
>
> I found the osd tree with the weight changes:
>
> # id weight type name up/down reweight
> -4 8 root root-for-two
> -1 4 pool one
> 0 5 osd.0 up 1
> 1 1 osd.1 up 1
> 2 1 osd.2 up 1
> 3 1 osd.3 up 1
> -2 4 pool two
> 0 1 osd.0 up 1
> 1 1 osd.1 up 1
> 2 1 osd.2 up 1
> 3 1 osd.3 up 1
> -3 12 root root-for-one
> -1 8 pool one
> 0 5 osd.0 up 1
> 1 1 osd.1 up 1
> 2 1 osd.2 up 1
> 3 1 osd.3 up 1
> -2 4 pool two
> 0 1 osd.0 up 1
> 1 1 osd.1 up 1
> 2 1 osd.2 up 1
> 3 1 osd.3 up 1
>
> My question is why only pool one's weight changed, but not pool two.
Currently the reweight (and most of the other) command(s) assume there is
only one instance of each item in the hierarchy, and only operate on the
first one they see.
What is your motivation for having the pools appear in two different
trees?
sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
