On Mon, 11 Feb 2013, Simon Leinen wrote: > We run a ten-node 64-OSD Ceph cluster and use IPv6 where possible. > > Today I noticed this error message from an OSD just after I restarted > it (in an attempt to resolve an issue with some "stuck" pgs that > included that OSD): > > 2013-02-11 09:24:57.232811 osd.35 [ERR] map e768 had wrong cluster addr ([2001:620:0:6::106]:6822/1990 != my [fe80::67d:7bff:fef1:78b%vlan301]:6822/1990) > > These two addresses belong to the same interface: > > root@h1:~# ip -6 addr list dev vlan301 > 7: vlan301@bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 > inet6 2001:620:0:6::106/64 scope global > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > inet6 fe80::67d:7bff:fef1:78b/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > 2001:620:... is the global-scope address, and this is how OSDs are > addressed in our ceph.conf. fe80:... is the link-local address that > every IPv6 interface has. Shouldn't these be treated as equivalent? Is this OSD by chance sharing a host with one of the monitors? The 'my address' value is learned by looking at the socket we connect to the monitor with... sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
