Re: rest mgmt api

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 02/06/2013 12:14 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 02/06/2013 01:34 PM, Sage Weil wrote:

I think the one caveat here is that having a single registry for commands
in the monitor means that commands can come in two flavors: vector<string>
(cli) and URL (presumably in json form).  But a single command
dispatch/registry framework will make that distinction pretty simple...

Any reason you can't have your CLI json-encode the commands (or,
conversely, your cgi/wsgi/php/servlet URL handler decode them into
vector<string>) before passing them on to the monitor?

We can, but they won't necessarily look the same, because it is unlikely
we can make a sane 1:1 translation of the CLI to REST that makes sense,
and it would be nice to avoid baking knowledge about the individual
commands into the client side.

  ceph osd pool create <poolname> <numpgs>
    vs
  /osd/pool/?op=create&poolname=foo&numpgs=bar

or whatever.  I know next to nothing about REST API design best practices,
but I'm guessing it doesn't look like a CLI.

sage

Well we could easily package, say, "mon getmap" into a json
vector-of-strings for transmission as the http payload of the PUT
request, *or* encode them as a simple "s1=mon&s2=getmap", but again, the
data format is so simple that I'm not sure it buys much. We definitely
want all the interpretation centralized in the daemons, I think, so this
is just string marshalling however we choose to do it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux