On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote:
> Am 30.01.2013 19:07, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
> > On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote:
> >> This set fixes some issues in the spec file.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure what the reason for
> >> #35e5d74e5c5786bc91df5dc10b5c08c77305df4e was. But I would revert
> >> it and fix the underlaying issues instead.
> >
> >
> > That is a pretty obtuse commit message, but it was actually because
> > while rbd-fuse is ready to be in-tree, we don't think it's ready for
> > people to be using; there are some undocumented gotchas involved with
> > it and not a lot of testing. :)
>
> Hm, but this is git master and not a released ceph version or the next
> tree. IMO rbd-fuse should be installed in the master branch to be
> tested. Otherwise it will be build but maybe never tested by others than
> developers which know it's there.
I think the end goal is to build an rbd-fuse package, just like ceph-fuse.
I'm not sure it matters how mature the tool is before it goes into the
package; as long as it is separate, people can not install it, and the
distros can keep it out of their supported repos as they like.
s
>
> > I'll let others comment on the Java library moves and other packaging
> > changes. -Greg
>
> Only an additional comment: I've moved the libcephfs_jni.* files to
> %{_libdir} because this is what SUSE already do for e.g. the *.so files
> in the libjnidispatch package.
>
> Danny
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
