Am 30.01.2013 19:07, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote:
>> This set fixes some issues in the spec file.
>>
>> I'm not sure what the reason for
>> #35e5d74e5c5786bc91df5dc10b5c08c77305df4e was. But I would revert
>> it and fix the underlaying issues instead.
>
>
> That is a pretty obtuse commit message, but it was actually because
> while rbd-fuse is ready to be in-tree, we don't think it's ready for
> people to be using; there are some undocumented gotchas involved with
> it and not a lot of testing. :)
Hm, but this is git master and not a released ceph version or the next
tree. IMO rbd-fuse should be installed in the master branch to be
tested. Otherwise it will be build but maybe never tested by others than
developers which know it's there.
> I'll let others comment on the Java library moves and other packaging
> changes. -Greg
Only an additional comment: I've moved the libcephfs_jni.* files to
%{_libdir} because this is what SUSE already do for e.g. the *.so files
in the libjnidispatch package.
Danny
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
