On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 01:44:15PM -0600, Mark Nelson wrote: > Is inode64 typically faster than inode32? I thought I remembered > dchinner saying that the situation wasn't always particularly clear > and it depended on the workload. Having said that, I can't really > see it not being a good thing for Ceph to spread metadata out over > all of the AGs, especially in the multi-disk raid config. I'll use > it for the next set of tests. Not for all workloads, but for the vast majority. Especially in the case where you have an inode for every 4MB of OSD data you'd much rather have the inode close to the actual file data. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
