Are we thinking about including this in 0.56?
Mark
On 12/03/2012 01:31 PM, Samuel Just wrote:
I rejected it only because I didn't manage to measure a performance
increase. The wip-filestore patches look fine though.
-Sam
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
While playing with recovery on the plane I saw big latency spikes caused
by draining the filestore op queue. This patch makes it only wait for
dequeued ops (current handed to threads) and not anything else. Passed
the rados suite without problems, and some basic testing on my laptop with
lots of filestore op threads.
I remember you had a patch doing something similar a while back and
rejected it... but I forget what the issue was?
sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
