Re: wip-filestore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I rejected it only because I didn't manage to measure a performance
increase.  The wip-filestore patches look fine though.
-Sam

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> While playing with recovery on the plane I saw big latency spikes caused
> by draining the filestore op queue.  This patch makes it only wait for
> dequeued ops (current handed to threads) and not anything else.  Passed
> the rados suite without problems, and some basic testing on my laptop with
> lots of filestore op threads.
>
> I remember you had a patch doing something similar a while back and
> rejected it... but I forget what the issue was?
>
> sage
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux