Hello,
i send a new patch using ssize_t. (Subject [PATCH] overflow of int ret:
use ssize_t for ret)
Stefan
Am 22.11.2012 09:40, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 22 November 2012 08:23, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
<s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 21.11.2012 23:32, schrieb Peter Maydell:
Looking at the librbd API (which is what the size and ret
values come from), it uses size_t and ssize_t for these.
So I think probably ssize_t is the right type for ret
(and size) in our structs here.
This sounds reasonable but does ssize_t support negative values? For error
values.
Yes, the first 's' in ssize_t means 'signed' and is the
difference between it and size_t.
-- PMM
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
