Am 21.11.2012 23:32, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 21 November 2012 17:03, Stefan Weil <sw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why do you use int64_t instead of off_t?
If the value is related to file sizes, off_t would be a good choice.
Looking at the librbd API (which is what the size and ret
values come from), it uses size_t and ssize_t for these.
So I think probably ssize_t is the right type for ret
(and size) in our structs here.
This sounds reasonable but does ssize_t support negative values? For
error values.
Greets,
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
