On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Dan Mick <dan.mick@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 11/12/2012 02:47 PM, Josh Durgin wrote: >> >> On 11/12/2012 08:30 AM, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> For this version, rbd cp assumes that destination pool is the same as >>> source, not 'rbd', if pool in the destination path is omitted. >>> >>> rbd cp install/img testimg >>> rbd ls install >>> img testimg >>> >>> >>> Is this change permanent? >>> >>> Thanks! >> >> >> This is a regression. The previous behavior will be restored for 0.54. >> I added http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/3478 to track it. > > > Actually, on detailed examination, it looks like this has been the behavior > for a long time; I think the wiser course would be not to change this > defaulting. One could argue the value of such defaulting, but it's also > true that you can specify the source and destination pools explicitly. > > Andrey, any strong objection to leaving this the way it is? I`m not complaining - this behavior seems more logical in the first place and of course I use full path even doing something by hand. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
