On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Jimmy Tang <jtang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 14 Nov 2012, at 16:14, Sage Weil wrote:
>
>>
>> Appending the codename to the version string is something we did with
>> argonaut (0.48argonaut) just to make it obvious to users which stable
>> version they are on.
>>
>> How do people feel about that? Is it worthwhile? Useless? Ugly?
>>
>> We can certainly skip it for 0.55 bobtail…
>
> Just throwing in some thoughts, but how about a scheme like ${name}-stable-${version}.tar.bz2 and have the corresponding directory structure inside and just ditch code names in the tar ball filename? It doesn't look as nice with out a codename, but it makes it absolutely clear to new users that it is a stable release.
>
Personally, I'd prefer standard naming of ${name}-${version}.tar.bz2.
You make it clear on your site which version is the LTS release, and
which are the developer releases.
t.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
