On 14 Nov 2012, at 16:14, Sage Weil wrote:
>
> Appending the codename to the version string is something we did with
> argonaut (0.48argonaut) just to make it obvious to users which stable
> version they are on.
>
> How do people feel about that? Is it worthwhile? Useless? Ugly?
>
> We can certainly skip it for 0.55 bobtail…
Just throwing in some thoughts, but how about a scheme like ${name}-stable-${version}.tar.bz2 and have the corresponding directory structure inside and just ditch code names in the tar ball filename? It doesn't look as nice with out a codename, but it makes it absolutely clear to new users that it is a stable release.
Jimmy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
