Re: less cores more iops / speed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>So it is a problem of KVM which let's the processes jump between cores a 
>>lot. 

maybe numad from redhat can help ?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/numad

It's try to keep process on same numa node and I think it's also doing some dynamic pinning.

----- Mail original ----- 

De: "Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG" <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
À: "Mark Nelson" <mark.nelson@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
Cc: "Joao Eduardo Luis" <joao.luis@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Envoyé: Jeudi 8 Novembre 2012 16:14:32 
Objet: Re: less cores more iops / speed 

Am 08.11.2012 14:19, schrieb Mark Nelson: 
> On 11/08/2012 02:45 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: 
>> Am 08.11.2012 01:59, schrieb Mark Nelson: 
>>> There's also the context switching overhead. It'd be interesting to 
>>> know how much the writer processes were shifting around on cores. 
>> What do you mean by that? I'm talking about the KVM guest not about the 
>> ceph nodes. 
> 
> in this case, is fio bouncing around between cores? 

Thanks you're correct. If i bind fio to two cores on a 8 core VM it runs 
with 16.000 iops. 

So it is a problem of KVM which let's the processes jump between cores a 
lot. 

Greets, 
Stefan 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in 
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux