Resolution: installing the packages built for precise, rather than
squeeze, got versions that use syncfs.
On 11/06/2012 08:31 AM, Oliver Francke wrote:
In answer to myself,
On 11/06/2012 05:14 PM, Oliver Francke wrote:
Hi *,
anybody out there who's in Ubuntu 12.04.1/ in connection with libc +
xfs + syncfs?
ii libc6 2.15-0ubuntu10.3
but:
apt-cache show...
.
.
Provides: glibc-2.13-1
.
.
playing with numbers, I think. But make clear, why syncfs-call is not in
:-\
... search continues...
We bit the bullet and reinstalled two new nodes from debian to precise
in favour of possible performance increase?!
*sigh*, still getting:
2012-11-06 17:05:51.863921 7f5cc52e3780 0 filestore(/data/osd6-3)
mount syncfs(2) syscall not support by glibc
2012-11-06 17:05:51.863925 7f5cc52e3780 0 filestore(/data/osd6-3)
mount no syncfs(2), must use sync(2).
as a show-stopper.
That's with 3.2.* and 3.6.6 kernel. Should be new enough. And
ceph-0.48.2 ( eu.ceph.com mirror was installing 0.48.1.. though *ops*
;) )
But both should be capable of this system-call?!
We've been so very near... but now clueless, please sched some light
in 8-)
( I hope this is not a very obvious human RTFM error ;) )
And so I'm writing, should one enable directio + aio, as we're having
the journals on a SSD-partition?
Kind regards,
Oliver.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
