On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Mark Kampe <mark.kampe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm not a real engineer, so please forgive me if I misunderstand, > but can't you create a separate rule for each data center (choosing > first a local copy, and then remote copies), which should ensure > that the primary is always local. Each data center would then > use a different pool, associated with the appropriate location- > sensitive rule. > > Does this approach get you the desired locality preference? This sounds right to me — I think maybe there's a misunderstanding about how CRUSH works. What precisely are you after, James? -Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
