On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Andrey Korolyov <andrey@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Guido Winkelmann > <guido-ceph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Am Dienstag, 11. September 2012, 17:25:49 schrieben Sie: >>> The next stable release will have cephx authentication enabled by default. >> >> Hm, that could be a problem for me. I have tried multiple times to get cephx >> working in the past, without lasting success. (I cannot recall at the moment >> what the problem was the last time around, but it was probably qemu/libvirt.) > > BTW, libvirt 0.10.x has a broken cephx support somehow. It forms same > string for -drive as 0.9x(at least in a log) but failing to pass > authentication same moment. > Please nevermind, I have build incorrect regex for log parsing previously. https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2012-September/msg00082.html >> >> IMHO, the documentation badly needs a high-level overview for cephx (or maybe >> I just haven't found it yet); what it does, what dangers it protects you from >> and how it achieves that. >> >> Guido >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
