Hi Ross, focusing on core stability and feature expansion for RBD was the right appoach in the past and I feel you have reached an adequate maturity level here. Performance enhancements - especially to reduce the latency of a single IO / increase IOPS - and a stronger engagement on the CephFS client would be very much appreciated. A stable and fast CephFS client would allow an efficient integration with - (clustered) NFS (v3 and v4) - (clustered) Samba v4 Cheers, -Dieter On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:12:16PM +0200, Ross Turk wrote: > > Hi, ceph-devel! It's me, your friendly community guy. > > Inktank has an engineering team dedicated to Ceph, and we want to work > on the right stuff. From time to time, I'd like to check in with you to > make sure that we are. > > Over the past several months, Inktank's engineers have focused on core > stability, radosgw, and feature expansion for RBD. At the same time, > they have been regularly allocating cycles to integration work. > Recently, this has consisted of improvements to the way Ceph works > within OpenStack (even though OpenStack isn't the only technology that > we think Ceph should play nicely with). > > What other sorts of integrations would you like to see Inktank engineers > work on? For example, are you interested in seeing Inktank spend more of > its resources improving interoperability with Apache CloudStack or > Eucalyptus? How about Xen? > > Please share your thoughts. We want to contribute in the best way > possible with the resources we have, and your input can help. > > Thx, > Ross > > -- > Ross Turk > Community, Ceph > @rossturk @inktank @ceph > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
