Re: [PATCH] make mkcephfs and init-ceph osd filesystem handling more flexible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Danny Kukawka <danny.kukawka@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So you mean chef?! Will there be an alternative to simply setup a
> cluster from console?
>
> We (SUSE) are already working on an own chef ceph cookbook. But from
> what I've seen till now it's really hard and more laborious to initially
> setup a cluster with chef than with mkcephfs.

I've written about this on the mailing list several times. We see a
lot of demand for Chef, but don't want to tie our hands -- Canonical
is working on Juju Charms, and I would like to see a mkcephfs
replacement that relies on just SSH connections from a workstation
node. We've made an explicit effort to improve the product as a whole,
and to make the Chef cookbook as thin as possible.

For some reason, the threading is broken on the archive, but this is a
fragment of the most recent thread that talked about this:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ceph.devel/8263/focus=8265
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux