Re: [PATCH] make mkcephfs and init-ceph osd filesystem handling more flexible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jim Schutt <jaschut@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm embarrassed to admit I haven't been keeping up with this,
> but I seem to recall that early versions didn't handle a
> journal on a partition.  Did I get that wrong, or maybe that
> capability exists now?  In the past I've found it to have a
> small performance benefit, and would hate to lose it.

It's still not quite ready for prime time. Journal placement was cut
out to allow us to focus on the distributed aspects of it first; those
are now working pretty well. Putting much effort on the alternative is
probably not a good bet.

This ticket needs to get fixed (and defined better, first!) to have
more flexibility with journals:
http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/2398
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux