Re: RBD layering design draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dan Mick <dan.mick <at> inktank.com> writes:

> 
> On 06/18/2012 11:01 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Josh Durgin wrote:
> >>>>      $ rbd copyup pool2/child1

> "disown" and "adopt"?  :)  (actually I started as a joke, but really I 
> kinda like that; fits with the parent-child name)

The issue I see with that is that the argument refers to the child rather than
the parent, so it doesn't match. I personally like 'unshare' since it'll also
work in the dedup case, but if we stick with the parent/child terminology
'emancipate' might work (although it lacks a good reverse).


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux