Re: poor OSD performance using kernel 3.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 30.05.2012 13:20, schrieb Stefan Majer:
> H,
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
> <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     Am 30.05.2012 09:19, schrieb Stefan Majer:
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > ok, so your replication level is 2 and you have 2*1GB/sec right ?
>     Generally yes - but for this new test it was just 1*1GB/s (see below).
> 
>     > do you have a iostat -x 3 output and or a dstat from all effected
>     > machines during your rados bench runs as well ?
> 
>     As the output looks exactly the same on all OSDs here is it from ONE
>     osd:
> 
>     Kernel 3.4:
>     http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=sV9vKsWy
> 
> This is strange, looks like a real regression in 3.4 ? but i guess it is
> only possible to track down this by doing 
> git bisect on the kernel sources :-(
I also tried 3.3 and 3.2 it's the same... (haven't tested 3.1).

>     Kernel 3.0:
>     http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=eafjpPpK
> 
> 
> Here you can see a constant rate to disk of ~ 50 - 70Mbyte/sec with
> about 10-15% utilization on  them. So this test is not disk bound i
> guess your network is saturated. Can you run dstat during this test as
> well to see the network bandwith used as well.
Absolutely correct. I'm aware of this. I just want to have this result
with 3.4 so that i can use btrfs.

Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux