> > I setup some tests today to try to replicate your findings (and also > check results against some previous ones I've done). I don't think I'm > seeing exactly the same results as you, but I definitely see xfs > performing worse in this specific test than btrfs. I've included the > results here. > > Full results are available here: > http://nhm.ceph.com/results/mailinglist-tests/ But these tests shows exactly he same bad behaviour i'm seeing. Instead of having a constant sequential write ratio you've heavily jumping values. Are you able to test with XFS and 3.0.32? You'll then probably see an absolutely constant write ratio. Greets, Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
