Am 29.05.2012 23:45, schrieb Yann Dupont: > Le 29/05/2012 23:34, Stefan Priebe a écrit : >> Am 29.05.2012 23:31, schrieb Yann Dupont: >>> on the contrary, pool data is jumping up & down, no matter how much >>> thread involved :) >>> >>> Maybe this is because journal is too tight ? Or because 2 of the 8 nodes >>> have slower disks ? >> Can you try with 3.0.X? I would be really interested what happens in >> this case. >> >> Stefan > hum... > probably not directly. Older btrfs won't like big metadata, I think. > This is quite a recent feature. That's absolutely correct. If you test 3.0.X i think its better to use XFS. I'm just interested if the problem we both see is gone for you too with 3.0.X. > I'll take the latest 3.0 kernel - or do you have a particular 3.0 kernel > version to test ? I've used the latest 3.0.X stable (.32 right now) > And Do you want a particular xfs/btrfs format ? mkfs.xfs is enough ;-) Thanks! Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
