Am 25.05.2012 09:33, schrieb Florian Haas: > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Am 24.05.2012 16:19, schrieb Florian Haas: >>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG >>> <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Take a look at these to see if anything looks familiar: >>>>> >>>>> http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=922 >>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/979498 >>>>> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2011-11/msg00400.html >>>> >>>> These are solved by using 3.0.20. >>> >>> ... or so Christoph says, but comment #4 in bug 922 seems to indicate otherwise. >> >> I'm sorry you're absolutely right. BUT XFS had some regressions with >> xlog_grabt_log_space since 2.6.28 which was fixed in 3.0.X by reverting >> back to a kernel thread instead of workers. I was working with Christoph >> and Dave on this problem and it tooked be nearly a whole month to track >> that down (git commit c7eead1e118fb7e34ee8f5063c3c090c054c3820). In this >> case (#922) it seems it is really related to a too small log. But I >> don't have a too small log in my ceph case ;-) > > Hmmm. So what's Chinner saying about this one? Should we move this > discussion to an XFS list? I already send the trace to Christoph, Dave and the XFS List. Sadly no reply. Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
