On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 24.05.2012 16:19, schrieb Florian Haas: >> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG >> <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Take a look at these to see if anything looks familiar: >>>> >>>> http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=922 >>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/979498 >>>> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2011-11/msg00400.html >>> >>> These are solved by using 3.0.20. >> >> ... or so Christoph says, but comment #4 in bug 922 seems to indicate otherwise. > > I'm sorry you're absolutely right. BUT XFS had some regressions with > xlog_grabt_log_space since 2.6.28 which was fixed in 3.0.X by reverting > back to a kernel thread instead of workers. I was working with Christoph > and Dave on this problem and it tooked be nearly a whole month to track > that down (git commit c7eead1e118fb7e34ee8f5063c3c090c054c3820). In this > case (#922) it seems it is really related to a too small log. But I > don't have a too small log in my ceph case ;-) Hmmm. So what's Chinner saying about this one? Should we move this discussion to an XFS list? Cheers, Florian -- Need help with High Availability? http://www.hastexo.com/now -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
