Re: Question about IoCtx::aio_exec semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Noah Watkins <jayhawk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've had a lot of success using rados_exec(), but I need to graduate the implementation to use IoCtx::aio_exec for increased concurrency. I'm a little confused about how aio_exec should be used:
>
> Here is aio_exec:
>
>   int aio_exec(const std::string& oid, AioCompletion *c, const char *cls, const char *method, bufferlist& inbl, bufferlist *outbl);
>
> I'd like to have many outstanding competitions, one for each call of aio_exec. Once @c has completed, I'd like to have access to the @outbl bufferlist. So, is the intended use here to allocate an empty bufferlist for each submitted completion?

Yes, you'll need to have a bufferlist for each request sent if your
exec is expected to return data. Note that only read operations should
return data.
>
> In rgw/rgw_rados.cc a use is:
>
>  AioCompletion *c = librados::Rados::aio_create_completion(NULL, NULL, NULL);
>  r = io_ctx.aio_exec(oid, c, "rgw", "dir_suggest_changes", in, NULL);
>  c->release();
>
> To clarify, are the semantics here that an asynchronous aio_exec is made without checking for completion or return values.

Right. We send the "dir_suggest_changes" request and dropping the
reference, so that we can't get the return value once it's done.

Yehuda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux