On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 08:40 -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > On Sun, 25 Mar 2012, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 14:27 +0530, Ajit K Jena wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > > > I have lost touch with the growth of ceph after version 0.30. > > > I am trying to compile version 0.43 and 0.44 on FC13 and FC15. > > > > FWIW, we've pushed 0.43 in Fedora 17. We don't have anything later than > > 0.41 in versions lower than 17 because of Fedora's updates policies. > > > > However, you could take the source rpm from F17 and rebuild it for older > > versions of Fedora. > > > > It's available at > > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/ceph/0.43/1.fc17/src/ceph-0.43-1.fc17.src.rpm > > > > I'll probably push 0.44 to F17 once I manage to get the RPM built. > > I just pushed two patches to the stable branch that should address this: > d3bcac241f25f681a585c2115a79befe43dd7d6c and > 3ab28950beabe9d452da35ec2f2d583751764a9a. Can you verify the problem goes > away? Ok, with the two patches, ceph builds, but leveldb doesn't seem to be using our compiler flags. The build is at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3930921 And the x86_64 build log is at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3930922&name=build.log If you scroll down to where leveldb builds and then to where ceph starts building after that, you'll see the difference in the build flags. Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
