Re: [PATCH] [ceph spec] package *.py* files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2012, Holger Macht <hmacht@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > So maybe we should just always put pyc files in for maximum
> > compatibility across distributions?
> 
> Yeah.

I should apply this, then?

> > My fault. I also recompressed them at the very start of working on the
> > spec file and changed it accordingly, but I'm fine for changing this
> > back to .gz.
> 
> I'd rather use the smallest available tarball, but we should use
> whatever ceph publishes.  If it's going to be .gz from now on, we have
> to change the spec file.

I'll start doing .bz2 (in addition to .gz) with 0.41.

Thanks!
sage

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux