Re: [PATCH] [ceph spec] package *.py* files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 19, 2012, Holger Macht <hmacht@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Alexandre Oliva <oliva <at> lsd.ic.unicamp.br> writes:
>> 
>> Some post-install rpmbuild defaults byte-compile all packaged python
>> files, so don't bother removing the .pyc files, and package .py* to
>> get both .pyo and .pyc.  It wastes a tiny little bit of space, but it
>> makes the spec file portable across a wider range of rpm and python
>> configurations.

> Just wondering...do you have a concrete issue or an example where this is a 
> problem?

It failed to build on a BLAGified Fedora 16, complaining about the
unpackaged .pyc files.  It's not just CentOS that creates the .pyc files
in brp-python-bytecompile.  Plus, they should be packaged (if at all) in
python-ceph, but definitely not in the main ceph package.


Another issue I forgot while posting the patch was that there was not a
.tar.bz2 available from the ceph site.  I ended up recompressing the .gz
as .bz2, but if ceph is going to be released compressed as .gz, the spec
file ought to be adjusted to reflect that.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist      Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux