On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 09:32, Andre Noll <maan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I believe that code and documentation should be located as close as > possible, and I'd also prefer to edit and access the documentation > locally via command line tools rather than through a browser. But > I don't have a strong opinion on this, so let's go for the web > documentation. I agree, and that's a big part of the reasons for choosing the toolchain I did! All the docs from http://ceph.newdream.net/docs are in the doc/ directory of the source tree. > Should I prepare something and post a request for inclusion to the > web pages on this mailing list, or do you want me to edit the web > documentation directly? Submit it like you would submit a code change. > Are you implying that ceph is only suitable for new clusters with > homogeneous hardware? I'm asking because our cluster is far from > homogeneous. There are 8 year old 2-core nodes with small SCSI disks > as well as 64-core boxes with much larger SATA disks. 8 year old? Wow. We do intend to fully support clusters with nodes of different capacity and speed (as I strongly believe most clusters will go through such a phase in their life). It's just not the default configuration, and won't be needed by most setups in the beginning. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
