Re: Feature request: "max mon" setting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Leander Yu <leander.yu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> Will there be any performance impact if there are too many mons?

Eventually there could be a small one. Every time the monitor systems
do a map update (to, for instance, change the record of whether an OSD
is up or down, or which MDS owns what data) it needs to get agreement
from a strict majority of the monitors. The more monitors you have the
higher the variance in latency you can get for this operation, and the
more bandwidth the leader monitor needs to devote to sending out the
updates to all the other monitors.
But under normal operation these map updates are "rare" (maybe one
every 5 seconds) and they're never in the client's critical path for
data transfer, so any performance issues would be noticed based on the
side effects they produce, not by client performance.
-Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux