On 07/11/2011 12:36 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Fyodor Ustinov wrote:
On 07/11/2011 12:12 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
Hmm, yeah the 'loaded dup inode' messages should never happen. They
appear to be just files, though, not directories, so you can safely ignore
them. The namespace repair will need to clean that up at some point. The
recursive rstat errors you saw are probably just fallout from that, and
can also be ignored.
I understand it correctly, that until not implemented the Feature # 86 I have
no way to fix this?
Right. Well, this is going to come incrementally. We'll have a namespace
scan that fixes some basic issues before there is a full-blown robust
repair tool.
ok, I'll be waiting impatiently.
:) Okay. We're putting locking specific tests in place before trying to
reproduce #1150 with Amanda, BTW. It sounds like we need an amanda-like
workload though anyway, given the issues you're seeing. How old is this
fs? How many times has it been upgraded?
fs has been created not later 2011-06-09.
I'm not sure that I understand correctly "fs upgraded", but cluster
upgraded to each new ceph versions. I.e. 0.29 -> 0.29.1 -> 0.30 -> 0.31
WBR,
Fyodor.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
