On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Gregory Farnum
<gregory.farnum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ermm, doesn't rados sync do a whole tree sync or something? I think we
> want to maintain a simple get/set object capability and the rados tool
> is a pretty logical place for that.
> -Greg
Sorry, Gmail got confused so I resent! :(
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 May 2011, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>> Ermm, doesn't rados sync do a whole tree sync or something? I think we
>> want to maintain a simple get/set object capability and the rados tool
>> is a pretty logical place for that.
>
> The main difference with sync is that it does incremental updates (skips
> dup items).
>
> As an aside I we should move that into the rados tool, though ('rados
> sync' instead of 'rados_sync')...
If it's that simple a syntax change, I agree. I thought rados_sync
would require an empty directory if you just want to pull an object
out, which was my main concern.
-Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
