Re: Ceph 0.23.2 Consolidated questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Gregory Farnum <gregf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:04 PM, DongJin Lee <dongjin.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I find that the journal sizes are consistent up to about 2040, after
>> things starts to get weird.
>> So this is what I get when I set journal size
>> size 1000 - 1 GB
>> size 2000 - 2 GB
>> size 2050 - 0 MB
>> size 2500 - 0 MB
>> size 3000 - 0 MB
>> size 4000 - 0 MB
>> size 5000 - 904 MB
>> size 10000 - 1.8 GB
>> when journal gets the 0 MB then I obviously get the 'unable to open
>> superblock' error.
> Hmmm, I'll try and look into this a bit, or get somebody else to do so.
Are you running on 32-bit machines? It looks like we're accidentally
overflowing a 32-bit value, but I don't have any 32-bit machines handy
to test it on. Please apply the patch at http://pastebin.com/yahTxRzQ,
recompile, and let me know if you still have journal size issues. :)
-Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux