On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 10:24:57PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote: > On Sat, 25 Dec 2010, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > In net/ceph/ceph_common.c::ceph_destroy_client() the pointer 'client' is > > > freed by kfree() and subsequently used in a call to dout() - use after > > > free bug. > > > > Not really. %p reads only the address of "client". > > kfree() does not alter this address. > > > > Ok, I see your point and you are correct. But still, the patch does not > change behaviour and it makes it absolutely clear that there's no > use-after-free bug, so it might still have merit... or? > I see these with Smatch as well. This type of usage is quite common. People do it deliberately and I guess they feel it's readable. Don't change them. If it were something that a static checker couldn't figure out, then I'd say change it, but really the static checkers should just be made smarter. Some day I'm going to make Smatch complain if it's a %s in the string instead of a %p, but for now I just ignore the false positives. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html