How's your CPU utilization on that processor? It'd be good if all those daemons ran fine on an Atom but I'm not sure? What's your config file look like? Journaling enabled? On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Thomas Mueller <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > hi > > i've done some performance tests on a small system. > > HW: > * Supermicro X7SPA-HF (with IMPI and KVMoverIP integrated)) > * Atom D510 1.6GHz DualCore and HT > * WD RE3 500GB 7200umin disks > * 4GB RAM > > SW: > * Debian 5.0 "Lenny" > * Kernel 2.6.32 (backports.org) > * ceph/unstable > * ceph-client-standalone/unstable-backport > > values are MB/s. all tests are local. > > dbench 1 results: > * 1 disk, btrfs: 115 > * 2 disks, btrfs data/metadata raid0: 115 > * 1 osd/disk, 1 mds, 1 mon: 7 > * 2 osd/disk, 1 mds, 1mon: 6.2117 > * 1 disk, btrfs, samba: 14.02 > * 2 disks, btrfs data/metadata raid0, samba: 13.781 > > dbench 10 results: > * 1 disk, btrfs: 271.724 > * 2 disks, btrfs data/metadata raid0: 270.043 > * 1 osd/disk, 1 mds, 1 mon: - > * 2 osd/disk, 1 mds, 1mon: 12.1862 > * 1 disk, btrfs, samba: 20.22 > * 2 disks, btfs data/metadata raid0, samba: 20.26 > > dd bs=1M count=8192 if=/dev/zero > * 1 disk, btrfs: 126 > * 2 disks, btrfs data/metadata raid0: 271 > * 1 osd/disk, 1 mds, 1 mon: - > * 2 osd/disk, 1 mds, 1mon: 51.2 > * 1 disk, btrfs, samba: 95.2 > * 2 disks, btrfs data/metadata raid0, samba: 85.9 > > will add a AOC-USAS-H8iR (LSI) RAID card to the mix if i get the cables > needed. > > i'm a bit suprised about the low rates of ceph. i'll try to to the same > tests on a more powerfull machine. > > - Thomas > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
