Re: Desktop Supercomputer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Greetings,

On 7/18/10, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
>> On 7/17/10, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>

Dear Les,

> Or did you mean that CentOS should have an equivalent to match the Ubuntu
> configuration?

Exactly. and I poised to do that as Centos x86_64 was attached thanks
to this month's Linux for You magazine's usual attachment CD/DVD.

>   You probably could, but it would be a lot more work.

Of course, and I am willing to share my work with this list along with
whatever income that incurr with it.

(Moderator: Kindly hange the subject line restrict my posting rights
if I have erred)

>
> Distributed (super) computing normally involves techniques that break the work
> up into independent units.  If a node doesn't complete a unit it can be given to
> a different node.

I know that.


>
> Storage, on the other hand, needs to be reliable.  The hadoop project is an
> approach at distribution, but the interface is hard to deal with.
>

Indeed and of course.

Regards,

Rajagopal
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux