Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Thanks Les for your reply. (I dont top-post normally, but this was an emergency)
Emergency? Sorry, but your posts are leading me to think that you have
lost it.
>> Have you looked at Ubuntu's setup? I don't think it deals with GPU's but it
>> might be an easier starting point than building from scratch, and if
>> anything
>> outgrows your resources it can move to Amazon's ec2.
>
> The point is, why should we not have and use our own resources?
>
/me blinks.
>> http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud/private
>>
>> But, I think you need to look at storage and compute facilities differently
>> in a
>> cloud model. Storage needs to be HA and redundant. Computing needs to be
>> able
>> to fail and be replaced.
>
> 1. I am not able to understand your above statement clearly. (see my
> earlier replies on this thread)
>
> 2. I believe (and have experienced including and mother and father),
> that nothing and/or everything is (ir)replacable.
/me stares.
>
> 4. I am not confused (See point 1)
>
Does not seem to be a matter of confusion.
You start on this list with a sharing model that sounds akin to
time-sharing investments of say a private yacht. Then you post a string
of stuff that are rather general, controversial, ill-informed but most
of all, nothing to do with Centos. Keep this up and you'll be getting
the boot. You've been 'warned' already by Karanbir.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
