On 06/29/10 6:17 PM, Craig White wrote: > Similar says, not exactly and the hard drives, controller and RAID > configuration differences would be the first place to look for your > answer. > > indeed, first place I'd look would be for things like battery backed raid controllers with/without writeback caching. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: How can binaries be different when package versions are identical? (mkfs.ext3 on CentOS 5.4)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: How can binaries be different when package versions are identical? (mkfs.ext3 on CentOS 5.4)
- From: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:37:36 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1277860639.22027.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.5
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: centos5.5 text install forcing me to add all disks to LVM volgroup
- Next by Date: Re: How can binaries be different when package versions are identical? (mkfs.ext3 on CentOS 5.4)
- Previous by thread: Re: How can binaries be different when package versions are identical? (mkfs.ext3 on CentOS 5.4)
- Next by thread: Re: How can binaries be different when package versions are identical? (mkfs.ext3 on CentOS 5.4)
- Index(es):
 |