Re: Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



on 6-28-2010 6:34 AM Whit Blauvelt spake the following:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:25:59AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
>> On 6/25/2010 8:33 AM, Brian Mathis wrote:
>>> - VMware Server seems like it's EOL, even though vmware hasn't
>>> specifically said so yet
>>
>> Given that there are known serious bugs in 2.0.2[*] and that release is 
>> now 8 months old, that seems plausible to me.  But another plausible 
>> explanation is that they've decided to throw all their effort at a 3.0 
>> release.
> 
> If you look on their site, they clearly specify that they do not offer a
> paid support option for VMware Server, that it's community supported only.
> Does that seem like an attitude towards a product they plan to update?
> 
> Whit
That just looks like they don't want to support something they give away...

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux