Re: Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 6/25/2010 8:33 AM, Brian Mathis wrote:
> - VMware Server seems like it's EOL, even though vmware hasn't
> specifically said so yet

Given that there are known serious bugs in 2.0.2[*] and that release is 
now 8 months old, that seems plausible to me.  But another plausible 
explanation is that they've decided to throw all their effort at a 3.0 
release.

Do you have any hard evidence that would help me decide between these 
two possibilities?

[*] glibc change with EL 5.4+ crashes server, creeping CPU time bug 
mentioned elsewhere in this thread, web UI buggier than Brazil in the 
rainy season...
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux