Re: ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so is not a symbolic link

[Gordon Messmer <yinyang@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 05/11/2010 07:09 PM, a arias wrote:
>
> I wonder if I am the only one who is experiencing this. What could 
> have caused this?
>

Look for other files that would otherwise be the targets of a symlink:

# ls /usr/lib64/libfreebl3*

It's normal for /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so to not be a symlink.  It 
shouldn't be a problem unless ldconfig locates another file which it 
will try to use as the target of a symlink.

Once you locate the other file, you can either remove the package that 
provides it (or remove the file if there is no such package) or ignore 
the error.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos